Logo Goletty

West Virginia´s Alternative and Renewable Energy Portfolio Act: The "Mountain State´s" Latest Attempt to Quit its Addiction to Coal
Journal Title Pittsburgh Journal of Environmental and Public Health Law
Journal Abbreviation pjephl
Publisher Group University of Pittsburgh (PITT)
Website http://pjephl.law.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php
PDF (357 kb)
   
Title West Virginia´s Alternative and Renewable Energy Portfolio Act: The "Mountain State´s" Latest Attempt to Quit its Addiction to Coal
Authors Paalborg, Alexander R.
Abstract This note´s purpose is to objectively analyze West Virginia´s recently enacted Alternative and Renewable Energy Portfolio Act ("AREPA") to determine whether it is the most ambitious alternative and renewable energy legislation that West Virginia can enact given its current political climate. Although coal may currently provide substantial economic benefits to West Virginia, future reliance on coal resources will be detrimental to the state´s overall welfare due to dwindling coal reserves and coal´s hazardous effects on the environment and public health. Because of coal´s negative public health and environmental effects, coalmining states face tremendous federal, state, and local pressures to implement cleaner energy production methods. In 2009, West Virginia enacted AREPA to quell some of these mounting concerns. The legislation, however, has an unusually permissive definition of "alternative" energy sources and technologies and has no minimum requirement for renewable energy. In order to truly diversify from coal, the West Virginia Legislature should amend its "renewable energy resources" standard to require that at least twenty percent of its energy portfolio come from actual renewable energy sources by 2025. The legislature must also amend AREPA to exclude many of the most heavily polluting "alternative" energy sources instead of ensuring their continued existence and harm to the state. Because of West Virginia´s dwindling coal reserves, the state´s wealth of renewable energy resources, and a growing anti-coal movement, the Mountain State should diversify fromcoal-based energy resources and establish an appropriate alternative energy portfolio standard that is more heavily geared towards truly promoting renewable energy.
Publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
Date 2013-05-01
Source Pittsburgh Journal of Environmental and Public Health Law Vol 6, No 1 (2011)
Rights Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;Noncommercial—other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;No Derivative Works—other users (including Publisher) may not alter, transform, or build upon this Work,with the understanding that any of the above conditions can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal´s published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.The Author represents and warrants that:the Work is the Author’s original work;the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;the Work has not previously been published;the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; andthe Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.an>

 

See other article in the same Issue


Goletty © 2024