Logo Goletty

Commentary on Nida vs. Chomsky´s Translation Theories
Journal Title Theory and Practice in Language Studies
Journal Abbreviation tpls
Publisher Group Academy Publisher
Website http://ojs.academypublisher.com
PDF (166 kb)
   
Title Commentary on Nida vs. Chomsky´s Translation Theories
Authors Mao, Huaizhou; Gu, Yingling; Liang, Ming
Abstract The paper intends to extrapolate the new perspective of “science” of translation as well as distinguish the differences and similarities in translation theories between Nida and Chomsky. However, the ultimate initiation zooms in the interpretations and understanding of the translation theories between the two. Both Chomsky and Nida made metaphysical claims about the object of investigation. Nida tends to reveals theoretical priorities, Chomsky’s theory is similarly constructed, making the “logic” of the models similar. Nida’s and Chomsky’s theories are self-reflective, but Chomsky’s universal forms exist at a much deeper, abstract level than Nida’s kernels.
Publisher ACADEMY PUBLISHER
Date 2012-06-01
Source Theory and Practice in Language Studies Vol 2, No 6 (2012)
Rights Copyright © ACADEMY PUBLISHER - All Rights Reserved.To request permission, please check out URL: http://www.academypublisher.com/copyrightpermission.html. 

 

See other article in the same Issue


Goletty © 2024