Logo Goletty

Bevacizumab for advanced ovarian cancer treatment. A GRADE based approach
Journal Title Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Health
Journal Abbreviation ebph
Publisher Group Letteratura Ellettronica Online (LEO)
Website http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/
PDF (1,022 kb)
   
Title Bevacizumab for advanced ovarian cancer treatment. A GRADE based approach
Authors Pappagallo, Giovanni L.; Torri, Valter
Abstract Background: in advanced ovarian cancer, over the last 10 years no studies have demonstrated more appropriate therapeutic options compared to the current standard Carboplatin-Paclitaxel (Cb-P) regimen. Two phase III randomized studies (GOG-218 36 and ICON-7 37) have recently demonstrated the efficacy of bevacizumab (recombinant monoclonal antibody that binds with a high affinity to VEGF-A) in adjunct to Cb-P, with 12-15 months maintenance treatment.Methods: the quality of evidence provided was assessed by the use of the GRADE method. Each outcome (deemed to be essential for the purpose of evaluation of the intervention) was assessed to express the degree of confidence in the entity of the beneficial and/or harmful effects of the intervention. Thus, limitations in the quality of conducting the studies (risk of bias), direct applicability/relevance of results to the target population, and precision of results were taken into account.Results: the GOG-218 and the ICON7 study (high-risk subgroup) demonstrated with MODERATE confidence an improvement in critical outcomes PFS and OS, with an absolute reduction of 96 (GOG-218) – 103 (ICON-7) episodes of progression, and 40 (GOG-218) – 135 (ICON-7) deaths per 1 000 patients. A marked increase in risk of hypertension of Grade ≥3 was observed, with an absolute increase of 59 episodes per 1 000 patients in the ICON-7 study, and 157 episodes in the GOG-218 study, respectively, the majority of which were controlled by means of appropriate treatment. The increased risk of other adverse events considered was negligible.Conclusions: the positive effects produced should be viewed as taking prevalence over the negative effects (FAVOURABLE benefit/harm ratio).
Publisher PREX
Date 2013-03-21
Source Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Health Vol 10, No 1 (2013)
Rights •    The authors warrant that the manuscript (or its essential substance) has not been published in any language or format and has not been submitted elsewhere for print or electronic publication consideration•    The authors warrant that the manuscript does not contain any material the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity•    The authors warrant that there aren’t potential conflicts of interest•    The authors will obtain and include with the manuscript written permission from any respective copyright owners for the use of any textual, illustrative, or tabular materials that have been previously published or are otherwise copyrighted and owned by third parties.When the article is accepted for publication. The authors, hereby agree to transfer to Prex s.p.a. all rights, including those pertaining to electronic forms and transmissions, under existing copyright laws.© Prex SpA

 

See other article in the same Issue


Goletty © 2024